Electrification requires listed bridge in Greater Manchester bridge to be raised

Roger Smith - Contributor 11 comments 2 Min Read
The Grade II listed Deep Pit bridge at Wigan. // Credit: Network Rail

The Grade II listed Deep Pit footbridge at near in Greater Manchester is being raised to accommodate overhead electric wires during the electrification of the Wigan to Bolton railway line.

The £100+m project to electrify the Wigan to Bolton line will enable the use of greener, cleaner, and quieter electric trains and improve travel across the North West.

Demolition of of Ladies Lane bridge at Hindley
Demolition of the nearby Ladies Lane bridge at Hindley. // Credit:

As well as raising the bridge, two new ramps will be installed to give the bridge completely step-free access for the first time since it was built in 1887.

Work is due to start in the next few months and be complete by early next year.

Deep Pit bridge is on the border of Hindley and in Wigan and needs to be raised so the electric wires carrying 25,000 volts can be installed safely above the line with plenty of clearance from the bridge above.

Hindley station – a finalist in the North West region. // Credit: Rail Delivery Group

The bridge is unusually long, built of wrought iron, and originally spanned nine tracks. Its architectural interest is because of its elegant design.

As well as serving as a footbridge, the bridge carried signalling equipment until the rationalisation of signalling in the area in 1972.

Footpath leading to Deep Pit bridge. // Credit: Google Maps

I am grateful to Wigan Council for their collaboration, and the local community for their contribution to the public consultation on the work at Deep Pit bridge.

This Grade II listed structure will now be future-proofed for years to come as we raise the bridge's height and add new ramps. This will make way for electric overhead lines as part of the Wigan to Bolton electrification project.

Sarah Bull, Sponsor at Network Rail

Share This Article
11 Comments
  • The main reason for NR saying a few years ago that they’d like to change from 3rd rail to OLE on the southern region, is that 3rd rail is so wasteful of energy. A lot of the energy is lost as heat.

  • The East Lancashire Line could perhaps see electrification to extend to Blackburn, Accrington, Burnley and electrification to Rochdale. And Northern to use Class 323, Class 319 and Class 331.

    • Network Rail are electrifying the East Kilbride line and have electrified to Barrhead to allow Class 380 and Class 385 to operate to Barrhead. And the Stranraer line could also be upgraded to have electrification so that Class 385s can operate to Stranraer.

  • Regarding having to raise this elegant bridge for electrification, the London Underground, metros and many train lines in the South East and South West use the third rail system. This seems to be very reliable and trains are able to go at fast speeds, e.g. Thameslink. I am no elecrical expert but when we hear of yet more ‘overhead line damage’ I wonder why we don’t use the third rail system more which must be far cheaper to install and maintain.
    Just a thought.
    David Hague, Sheffield.

    • Due to safety concerns (I.e. stepping on a 750 DC) and performance limits, the ORR heavily discourage new third rail electrification and is even looking at replacing the existing 3rd rail with overhead electrification. This is the reason why trains run on batteries between Headbolt Lane and Kirkby

      • If someone treads on a 750DC rail, wouldn’t they have been trespassing? When you look out of a carriage window, some third rails seem to have a cover over them. Are there many incidents with third rails to make the ORR worry? Overhead electrification looks to be very expensive and time consuming – look how long it is taking for the Midland Main Line electrification to extend further north.
        David Hague.

        • Under the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984 Network Rail will still owe a duty of care to trespassers if they have reasonable grounds to suspect that there is a risk to them on the premises. There are also all of the maintenance staff who are out every day on live lines where it is a lot safer when the 25kv is 4m in the air rather than having to cross within cms of 750DC. You could put in a FoI request to Network Rail or the ORR to find out how many incidents have happened on 3rd rail.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Exit mobile version
X